The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism Book PDF, ePub eBook

Join our eBook service for unlimited books & audiobooks. Get a free 7 day subscription! ↓↓↓↓↓


Book Descriptions:
At the heart of this book is the age-old question of how law and morality are related. The legal positivist, insisting on the separation of the two, explicates the concept of law independently of morality. The author challenges this view, arguing that there are, first, conceptually necessary connections between law and morality and, second, normative reasons for including moral elements in the concept of law. While the conceptual argument alone is too limited to establish a sufficiently strong connection between law and morality, and the normative argument alone fails to address the nature of law, the two arguments together support a nonpositivistic concept of law, toppling legal positivism qua comprehensive theory of law.

The author makes his case within a conceptual framework of five distinctions that can be variously combined to represent a multiplicity of presuppositions or perspectives underlying the enquiry into the relationship of law and morality. In this context, it can indeed be shown that there are perspectives that bespeak solely a positivistic concept of law. The decisive point, however, is that there is a perspective, necessary to the law, that necessarily presupposes a nonpositivistic concept of law. This is the perspective of a participant in the legal system, asking for the correct answer to a legal question in this legal system. The participant-thesis is demonstrated by appeal to Gustav Radbruch's formula (extreme injustice is not law) and to the judge's balancing of principles in deciding a concrete case. The author arrives at a concept of law that systematically links classical elements of legal positivism - authoritative issuance and social efficacy - with the desideratum of nonpositivistic legal theory, correctness of content.

The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism by Robert Alexy, Stanley Paulson, Bonnie Paulson

From reader reviews:

Charlene Martinez:

Book is written, printed, or descriptive for everything. You can realize everything you want by a guide. Book has a different type. As we know that book is important point to bring us around the world. Beside that you can your reading expertise was fluently. A reserve The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism will make you to become smarter. You can feel much more confidence if you can know about almost everything. But some of you think in which open or reading some sort of book make you bored. It's not make you fun. Why they could be thought like that? Have you looking for best book or suitable book with you?

James Brown:

Do you considered one of people who can't read pleasant if the sentence chained in the straightway, hold on guys this aren't like that. This The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism book is readable by simply you who hate those perfect word style. You will find the information here are arrange for enjoyable reading through experience without leaving actually decrease the knowledge that want to give to you. The writer regarding The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism content conveys the idea easily to understand by lots of people. The printed and e-book are not different in the information but it just different available as it. So , do you even now thinking The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism is not loveable to be your top checklist reading book?

Mary Moore:

Often the book The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism has a lot of information on it. So when you make sure to read this book you can get a lot of gain. The book was compiled by the very famous author. Tom makes some research ahead of write this book. That book very easy to read you can get the point easily after reading this book.

Dorcas Rogers:

That reserve can make you to feel relax. This kind of book The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism was colourful and of course has pictures around. As we know that book The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism has many kinds or category. Start from kids until youngsters. For example Naruto or Private eye Conan you can read and think you are the character on there. So , not at all of book usually are make you bored, any it can make you feel happy, fun and loosen up. Try to choose the best book for you personally and try to like reading which.